Friday, January 21, 2005

Helping others find their own voice

Let's review that inauguration speech again. How did that go? Oh yes, that's right:
America will not impose our own style of government on the unwilling. Our goal, instead, is to help others find their own voice, attain their own freedom and make their own way.






And then there was that other part:
We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right.
Photos are of children crying after their parents were shot when they failed to stop at a checkpoint in Iraq. The blood is, apparently, their parents' not their own. (From a small, pretty amazing collection at the BBC.)

Quote of the day

The new Democratic Party motto:
"A moment of resistance, a lifetime of capitulation."

Jon Stewart (via Ratiocination)

What a field-day for the heat














Slipping through the net

If you haven't been to Oliver Willis yet to see the Fox clip about the inaugural, you should go watch it now. Judy Bachrach totally kneecaps "newscaster" Quinn by actually expressing a criticism of Bush's Cabaret. I particularly love the moment when Quinn--hosting a segment on a news station about a presidential inaugural--says she didn't know Bachrach was going to talk about politics. (Anybody in the industry looking for work, I have a sense Fox is hiring folks to vet their guests.)
And a very special thanks to my sponsor

Thursday, January 20, 2005

How you know you live in LA

Your friend valet parks her car to protest the inauguration.

Really.

Today in DC




"[R]ights must be more than the grudging concessions of dictators; they are secured by free dissent and the participation of the governed."

George W. Bush
Second Inaugural Address
(Pic from DC Indymedia).

Solacing myself with irony

Via Corrente comes this marvelous story from CNN:
Poll: Nation split on Bush as uniter or divider

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 Posted: 4:19 PM EST (2119 GMT)

On the eve of President Bush's inauguration, a poll shows the nation is split over whether he has united or divided the nation, but a majority believe his inauguration festivities should be toned down because of the war.

During the 2000 campaign, Bush promised to be a "uniter, not a divider."

Forty-nine percent of 1,007 adult Americans said in phone interviews they believe Bush is a "uniter," according to the CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Wednesday. Another 49 percent called him a "divider," and 2 percent had no opinion.
Isn't that fabulous, really? I figured if it can make me laugh today, I should certainly share it.

"We are all tourists in history, and irony is what we win in wars."
Anatole Broyard

Letters I sent to my senators yesterday

Dear Senator Feinstein,

I read the text of the Foreign Relations Committee hearing of Condoleeza Rice and saw that the final vote was 16-2 with you voting in favor of endorsing Rice. I would outline my objections here--torture is wrong, endless war is wrong, lying to the public is wrong...--but you are a smart woman and surely you know why Rice is a vile candidate for the post and why you ought to be ashamed of yourself for endorsing her. Thomas Paine said it better than I could:

"I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul by swearing allegiance to one whose character is that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man. I conceive likewise a horrid idea in receiving mercy from a being, who at the last day shall be shrieking to the rocks and mountains to cover him, and fleeing with terror from the orphan, the widow, and the slain of America.

There are cases which cannot be overdone by language, and this is one. There are persons too who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them, they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if they succeed will be merciful. It is the madness of folly to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object is only a trick of war: The cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf; and we ought to guard equally against both."

I hope you enjoy your stay in the Lincoln Bedroom or whatever other spoil of war you've traded your soul for.

Ashamed to call myself your constituent,



Dear Senator Boxer,

I just wanted to write and thank you for doing such a great job representing your constituents. I suspect you are the only ethical person left in the Senate, and I hope you keep on the alert so that you can continue to evade the mysterious soul sucking body snatcher that is turning your fellow democrats into pod politicians.

Your vote and voice in the Rice hearings and the challenge to the Ohio vote make me proud to be a Californian (even in the face of my other senator's obsequious performance). Please keep the faith Ms. Boxer. Know that even if some days, you may tilt at windmills, those battles have effects you don't see. You are helping some of us hang on for the next four years.

With the utmost admiration,

Reading around

Below I complained that I was getting tired of referencing 1984 over and over. Could we please come up with a new proof text, I asked. As if reading my mind, Richard J. Leon of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia has issued a judgment on the Guantanamo Bay prisoners. The Supreme Court, you may recall, has ruled that the prisoners can invoke Habeas Corpus. That is to say, they can demand that federal court determine whether they are imprisoned legally. So seven prisoners have petitioned Leon's court. The NYT reports that Leon:
said the seven prisoners who brought a claim in his court could not be granted what they had asked for, writs of habeas corpus that would have required the federal courts to consider whether they were lawfully detained. . . . He made a distinction between the right to file for a habeas corpus petition before a judge and the right to obtain one.
I personally want to thank Judge Leon for answering my plea and turning our attention to Catch-22 and The Trial as explanatory texts for our time. Variety is the spice of life.

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Four more years


16 to 2

I know, I said it in the post below, but I feel the need to reiterate: the vote to endorse Rice was 16 to 2. All I can say is, they're going to have a hard time finding enough room in hell when this generation dies off. Here's a snippet from yesterday's hearing (evoking more than a little, Gonzales' hearing). Shouldn't this alone be enough to make any ethical Senator vote no:
SEN. DODD: Let me just come back to the point. I just want to make this simple question.

MS. RICE: Yes.

SEN. DODD: Is it your view, as a human matter, that water- boarding and the use, as we saw, in prisons in Iraq of nudity -- is that torture in your personal view, as a nominee here for the --

MS. RICE: Senator, I'm not going to speak to any specific interrogation techniques, but let me talk about Abu Ghraib, because that was not acceptable.

SEN. DODD: I'd like to just get your views on just a simple matter. It's a simple question I'm asking. I'm not --

MS. RICE: Well, you asked me about the incidents in Iraq, and --

SEN. DODD: (Off mike) -- asking about some very specific techniques that were used, whether or not you consider them to be torture or not.

MS. RICE: Senator, the determination of whether interrogation techniques are consistent with our international obligations and American law are made by the Justice Department. I don't want to comment on any specific interrogation techniques. I don't think that would be appropriate, and I think it would not be very good for American security.

SEN. DODD: Well, let's leave it, if that's your answer, there. It's a disappointing answer, I must say. The face of U.S. foreign policy is in the person of the secretary of State, and it's important at moments like this to be able to express yourself aside from the legalities of things, how you as a human being react to these kinds of activities. And with the world watching, when a simple question is raised about techniques that I think most people would conclude in this country are torture, it's important at a moment like that that you can speak clearly and directly without getting involved in the legalisms questions. I understand these involve some legal determinations, but as a human being how you feel about this, about to assume the position and be responsible for pursuing the human rights issues that this nation has been deeply committed to for decades, is a very important moment.

MS. RICE: Senator, I maintain the commitment and will maintain the commitment of the United States to norms of international behavior and to the legal norms that we have helped to --

SEN. DODD: Let me ask you this, then. What would happen if someone did this to an American? What would happen if we saw on television that a captured American was being subjected to these kind of activities? How would you react to it?

MS. RICE: Senator, the United States of America -- American personnel are not engaged in terrorism against innocents.

SEN. DODD: I wasn't asking you what they have been charged with. I'm asking whether or not, if you saw an American be treated like this, how would you react?

MS. RICE: We expect Americans to be -- because we are parties to the Geneva Conventions, we expect Americans to be treated in accordance with the Geneva Conventions.

SEN. DODD: Of course we do. And do you consider these kinds of activities to violate the Geneva Conventions?

MS. RICE: We believe that there are certain categories of people, the al Qaeda, for instance, who were not covered by Geneva, that in fact it would have been a stretch to cover them under Geneva, would have weakened Geneva to cover them. But the president said that they had to be treated, as military necessity allowed, consistent with the application of Geneva.

SEN. DODD: Do me a favor. At the end of all of these hearings, I'd like you to spend about 15 minutes with John McCain and talk to him about this stuff. I think you'll get some good advice when it comes to the subject matter, someone who has been through this, about what the dangers are when we have sort of waffling answers about these questions and then Americans can be apprehended and what happens to them.

Let me move on, because I don't want to take up the committee's time on this particular point, but I'm troubled by your answer.
Boxer, of course, picked up the topic as well. After hammering away at it, she was able to obtain only a feeble legalistic answer saying basically, it's okay to torture people.

BOXER: Now last Thursday we find out that after the Senate unanimously approved an amendment to restrict the use of extreme interrogation measures by American intelligence officers, you wrote a letter, along with Mr. Bolten, to the members of the conference committee, asking them to strike that language from the final bill. And unfortunately, that is what they did, at your request.

Now -- (to staff) -- can you bring this over here, so I can see it? I want to read you the operative language that you asked to be struck from the bill, that was struck from the bill. "In general" -- and by the way, this was written by Joe Lieberman and John McCain -- John McCain, a man who knows what torture is. So he wrote this, with Joe Lieberman.

"In general, no prisoner shall be subject to torture or cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment that is prohibited by the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States." Pretty straightforward, pretty elegant, bipartisan -- passed the Senate, that amendment, unanimously, every single member.

A letter comes, and the newspaper writes that at your request, "At the urging of the White House, congressional leaders scrapped a legislative measure last month that would have imposed new restrictions on the use of extreme interrogation measures by American intelligence officers. In a letter to members of Congress sent in October and made available by the White House on Wednesday" -- this is last week -- "Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, expressed opposition to the measure, on the grounds that it, quote, 'provides legal protections to foreign prisoners to which they are not now entitled under applicable law and policy.'"

MS. RICE: I was making -- I was making a broader point, Senator, which is that the Geneva Conventions should not be extended to those who don't live up to the obligations of the Geneva Convention.
Here's what I don't get. Truly. If the argument is that the Geneva Conventions don't apply to terrorists, any terrorists, because their identity as terrorists supersedes their identity as citizens of a nation that is a party to the Geneva Conventions, how is that argument valid when you're torturing people that you don't even have enough evidence to charge or try for a crime? I'm certain I must not have all of the information. And if I do, why didn't anybody in that hearing room say that to either Gonzales or Rice? What am I missing here?

These are the times that try men's souls

Upon the eve of the inauguration and the night after Rice's 16-2 Foreign Relations Committee vote, I am reading Thomas Paine. I am thinking of sending the following to Feinstein as I don't think I could do a better job expressing my disgust:
I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul by swearing allegiance to one whose character is that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man. I conceive likewise a horrid idea in receiving mercy from a being, who at the last day shall be shrieking to the rocks and mountains to cover him, and fleeing with terror from the orphan, the widow, and the slain of America.

There are cases which cannot be overdone by language, and this is one. There are persons too who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them, they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if they succeed will be merciful. It is the madness of folly to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object is only a trick of war: The cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf; and we ought to guard equally against both.
And that folks, is why I was an eighteenth-century scholar, in case you're wondering. It's easy to forget we had a revolution in this country.

Yes, I was inspired by tonight's West Wing episode, and I'm embarrassed to admit I seemingly cannot watch the show anymore without crying. Will we ever have an administration that cares about anything important again? Four years is a long time. I am so depressed tonight that, were I to see a therapist right now and tell him that my emotions were a result of a romance, I'm sure he would try to medicate me. As it is, because they are the result of a presidency, he'd probably try to convince me they were the result of a romance or a childhood trauma. I'm not sure how to survive the next four years. I've been searching my memory banks, trying to recall if I ever felt this way before--this despairing about the political situation. I do remember sinking into the slough of despond during the first Gulf War. (By the way, did anyone catch Rice's comment during her hearing: "In the Middle East, President Bush has broken with six decades of excusing and accommodating the lack of freedom in hoping to purchase stability at the price of liberty." Say what?? We did "bomb them back the middle ages" not so long ago, didn't we? Did I hallucinate all of those yellow ribbons and reports about smart bombs?) In any case, yes, I was pretty depressed then. I think I may be more depressed now. I know I am more fearful of our collective future. I'm grateful for my likeminded friends here in LA and the virtual friends I've met over the last little while. Keep passing the open windows everyone.

Why it is criminal to associate Rice with King

Here is King speaking to the Southern Leadership Council six months before his assassination:

I want to say to you as I move to my conclusion, as we talk about "Where do we go from here?" that we must honestly face the fact that the movement must address itself to the question of restructuring the whole of American society. (Yes) There are forty million poor people here, and one day we must ask the question, "Why are there forty million poor people in America?" And when you begin to ask that question, you are raising a question about the economic system, about a broader distribution of wealth. When you ask that question, you begin to question the capitalistic economy. (Yes) And I'm simply saying that more and more, we've got to begin to ask questions about the whole society. We are called upon to help the discouraged beggars in life's marketplace. (Yes) But one day we must come to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. (All right) It means that questions must be raised. And you see, my friends, when you deal with this you begin to ask the question, "Who owns the oil?" (Yes) You begin to ask the question, "Who owns the iron ore?" (Yes) You begin to ask the question, "Why is it that people have to pay water bills in a world that's two-thirds water?" (All right) These are words that must be said. (All right)

Now, don't think you have me in a bind today. I'm not talking about communism. What I'm talking about is far beyond communism. (Yeah) My inspiration didn't come from Karl Marx (Speak); my inspiration didn't come from Engels; my inspiration didn't come from Trotsky; my inspiration didn't come from Lenin. Yes, I read Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital a long time ago (Well), and I saw that maybe Marx didn't follow Hegel enough. (All right) He took his dialectics, but he left out his idealism and his spiritualism. And he went over to a German philosopher by the name of Feuerbach, and took his materialism and made it into a system that he called "dialectical materialism." (Speak) I have to reject that.

What I'm saying to you this morning is communism forgets that life is individual. (Yes) Capitalism forgets that life is social. (Yes, Go ahead) And the kingdom of brotherhood is found neither in the thesis of communism nor the antithesis of capitalism, but in a higher synthesis. (Speak) [applause] It is found in a higher synthesis (Come on) that combines the truths of both. (Yes) Now, when I say questioning the whole society, it means ultimately coming to see that the problem of racism, the problem of economic exploitation, and the problem of war are all tied together. (All right) These are the triple evils that are interrelated.
Who owns the oil, indeed. I am too busy to comment right now on this, but to say King was one of this country's all time greats. Conservative attempts to coopt his speeches and ideas are nothing short of ethically criminal.

Praise god and pass the rice

If I had the energy, I would go through the transcripts of yesterday's Rice hearing and cull the 847 times Birmingham and Dr. King were brought up. But I don't, so instead I give you an excerpt from Feinstein's opening remarks. You might want to make sure there's a trashcan or bucket handy to barf in before you read them:

. . . Dr. Rice's story began 50 years ago with her birth in Birmingham, Alabama. A precocious child, she began piano lessons at age 3, could read by 5, and skipped the 1st and 7th grades. She attended public schools before enrolling at Birmingham Southern Conservatory of Music in 1964. Her mother and father are here in spirit today. Her father, an educator and pastor, aptly nicknamed his only child Little Star. Today, she is, indeed, a big star. Dr. Rice's family moved to Denver, Colorado, in 1969, where she entered an integrated school for the first time as a tenth grader. Staying close to home, she opted for the University of Denver, and was awarded her B.A. degree with honors at the age of 19.

. . .

She returned to the White House as the first African-American woman to serve as national security adviser in January 2001. As a young girl, Condi stood at the gates of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with her father, telling him, that, quote, Daddy, I'm barred out of there now because of the color of my skin, but one day I'll be in that house, end quote. She's delivered on that promise. Now she is the president's choice to be our country's next secretary of state. As both the chairman and the ranking member have so well stated, American foreign policy today is at a crossroads. In Iraq, across the Middle East, in North Korea, in our relations with China and in so many other places we face major challenges. I would submit that Dr. Rice has the skill, the judgment and the poise and the leadership to lead in these difficult times. If confirmed, she will have the deep personal trust and confidence of the president; a real asset. She's been by his side for every crucial national security decision in the last four years. My sense is that the president trusts her implicitly. When Dr. Rice meets with Hu Jintao or Ariel Sharon or Vladimir Putin, there will be no doubt that she speaks for and on behalf of the president of the United States. The problems we face abroad are complex and sizable. If Dr. Rice's past performance is any indication, though, we can rest easy. It's difficult to know ahead of time how anyone will perform as secretary of state. Time and events test vision, facile thinking and resolute problem solving. But indeed, this is a remarkable woman that I introduce to you today, and it is with great pride that I do so.
At least Boxer came out swinging as she'd promised to do. I really urge any of my fellow Californians to write her and thank her for remaining one of the few stand-up members of our government.

First she points out a moment of excessive candor:
And if you're going to become the voice of diplomacy, this is just a helpful point. When Senator Voinovich mentioned the issue of tsunami relief, you said -- your first words were The tsunami was a wonderful opportunity for us. Now, the tsunami was one of the worst tragedies of our lifetime, one of the worst, and it's going to have a 10-year impact on rebuilding that area. I was very disappointed in your statement. I think you blew the opportunity.
Then she, having done her homework, plays a game of "catch the weasel" by quoting Rice's own contradictory statements about the Iraq war:

BOXER: Well, you should you read what we voted on when we voted to support the war, which I did not, but most of my colleagues did. It was WMD, period. That was the reason and the causation for that particular vote. But again, I just feel, you quote President Bush when it suits you, but you contradicted him when he said, Yes, Saddam could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. You go on television, nine months later, and said, Nobody ever said it was going to be.

RICE: Senator, that was just a question of pointing out to people that there was an uncertainty, that no one was saying that he would have to have a weapon within a year for it to be worth it to go to war.

BOXER: Well, if you can't admit to this mistake, I hope that you will rethink it.

RICE: Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like. But I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity. Thank you very much.

BOXER: I'm not. I'm just quoting what you said. You contradicted the president and you contradicted yourself.

RICE: Senator, I'm happy to continue the discussion. But I really hope that you will not imply that I take the truth lightly.
This last bit has been cited in the papers quite a lot, often with a disparaging tone. For example, my own LA Times runs an article today titled "Rose and Thorn" about Feinstein and Boxer. If you know me, you can imagine my teeth gritting when reading that. Could we please evolve to the point where we don't need to use floral metaphors to describe good girls and "thorns" to describe one of the only members of the Senate who hasn't been stricken by the mysterious spine-eating virus? For fuck's sake. Would it ever occur to anyone to call Biden or Kerry or Feingold a rose or a thorn? Aaargh.

And for that matter, what on earth is a hearing for if not to question the integrity of someone who feigns an ethical stance? Are they all gathered there to exchange Birmingham stories and thereby sully the memory of one of America's greats? I find it repulsive that Feinstein joined in the effort to hitch Condi's wagon to King's star. My only wish is that Boxer could have actually quoted some of King's speeches on non-violence or the war in Vietnam and asked Rice how she felt about that.

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

JibJab

JibJab has an inauguration piece up. I'm too depressed about the mere fact of the inauguration to be amused by much, but somebody might appreciate it. (And they're selling posters of that fine LA Times piece.)

Yikes!

The results are in for Bleach Eating Freaks' Office Bricolage contest in which you try to make the most destructive weapon possible from random office supplies. It's very much a Dilbert meets Travis Bickle kind of thing (right up some of y'all's alleys, I know).

The winner is the "office bow of death," and I am very sorry I'm unable to get the video to play. Starting with just 4 wooden rulers, a box of PaperMate pens, a bag of 84 size rubber bands, strapping tape, and a small length of Cat5 cable, you end with a potentially lethal weapon, as the creator notes:
Note**: This information is provided as "Educational Knowledge".
This weapon can actually penetrate flesh, muscle and eyeballs.
I am not responsible for the mis-use of this knowledge.
Don't try this at home, kids. Gives whole new meaning to nsf. (And they taunt me because I spend my spare time blogging.)

Synergy

These are the headlines for YahooNews' top five stories right this minute:

Rice Links Iraq Withdrawal to Security

Gunmen Kill Three Iraqi Candidates

U.S. Man Charged in Oil-For-Food Probe

World's Largest Passenger Plane Unveiled

Exit pollsters to release election report to media
Really the synergy is killing me. Can I just go to sleep and wake up in four years? Hmm...I guess not.

I think it's a good rule of thumb

not to trust people who have oil tankers named after them. I am so glad I'm at work today so that I don't have to listen to the panderfest.

I'm all for truth in advertising

but this just seems like the sort of thing that need not be regulated. If you really think you can trade in that wrinkle cream for a career in a classroom, you deserve what you get. It's right up there with believing that if you buy that car, suddenly beautiful women with big breasts will drape themselves over the hood, in my book.

Tonight we're going to party like it's 1999

Have I mentioned how glad I am I no longer live in DC? Tom Ridge has reassured us all today that all is well for the "Celebrating Freedom" inaugural:
We will have 24-7 surveillance of key Inaugural facilities, as well as portable x-ray equipment to examine packages, as well as commercial vehicles and delivery trucks entering these areas. In addition, we will deploy trained Homeland Security personnel to augment the work of local law enforcement.

We anticipate there will be about 6,000 law enforcement personnel here from dozens of federal, state and local agencies. We will utilize record numbers of canine bomb teams. We're spending a great deal of money in the Department of Homeland Security very appropriately on the technology of detection, but you get back to the basic canine team, they're about as good as they get.

We'll increase security at hotels to protect both the buildings and the ventilation systems, and we will monitor and protect key transportation systems.

. . .

We're just going to remind everyone, as often as we can, to remain vigilant. If you see any suspicious items or activities, we just ask you to go up to one of those local law enforcement personnel and report it. Vigilance is the added level of security that those who are participating in the Inaugural events and the citizens of the community can add to our security effort.

You can well imagine that the security for this occasion will be unprecedented. Protective measures will be seen; there will be quite a few that are not seen. Our goal is that any attempt on the part of anyone or any group to disrupt the Inaugural will be repelled by multiple layers of security.
Good luck to you my brothers and sisters who will be protesting there. I hope you have bail options lined up before you go.

Monday, January 17, 2005

You know what I would really love?

I would really love to feel hard pressed to make an analogy with 1984; I really would. I think I've brought the damn book up about twelve times in the last two months. It would really make me happy if we could change the proof text of our historical moment to something different (and please no one suggest Blade Runner)

Riding with the bad boys

I'm not comprehensive. That's part of what I love about a blog (as opposed to, say, a dissertation): there's no imperative to be comprehensive. Nonetheless, sometimes I think "Gee Trav, everybody's talking about x or y. Don't you want to weigh in?"

These past few days, there were two things "everybody" was talking about. First, the rather absurd comparison between Armstrong Williams and two bloggers on the Dean payroll. The answer to the above question, "Don't you want to weigh in?" is, in this case, no. I am not enough part of the blognoscenti to know these folks and there are plenty more hip to the scene than I who are talking about it.

The second thing showing up on blogs-a-plenty is Seymour Hersh's article in The New Yorker. That's a different matter. If you haven't read it, make the time. The short version is, welcome to the world of ceaseless, unending war perpetrated with no governmental oversight:

Rumsfeld added that America was committed to staying in Iraq and that there would be no second-guessing.

"This is a war against terrorism, and Iraq is just one campaign. The Bush Administration is looking at this as a huge war zone," the former high-level intelligence official told me. "Next, we're going to have the Iranian campaign. We've declared war and the bad guys, wherever they are, are the enemy. This is the last hurrah--we've got four years, and want to come out of this saying we won the war on terrorism."
I know I am a pessimist when it comes to these sorts of things, but does anyone really believe that it's possible to eliminate terrorism??? For fuck's sake. It's whack-a-mole with AK-47s. What an absurd mission. Why am I having a "war against drugs" ptsd moment all of a sudden? But we're not just fighting a war no one can win against country of the month, we're also rewriting the rules for accountability and checks and balances (checks and balances are, like, so last week):

The President has signed a series of findings and executive orders authorizing secret commando groups and other Special Forces units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets in as many as ten nations in the Middle East and South Asia.

The President's decision enables Rumsfeld to run the operations off the books--free from legal restrictions imposed on the C.I.A.
War with Iran? You betcha. Death squads? And how. The Pentagon answering to no one? Right on.
"Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?" the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. "We founded them and we financed them," he said. "The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren't going to tell Congress about it." A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon's commando capabilities, said, "We're going to be riding with the bad boys."
Truly, I am beginning to believe we should outlaw the western as a genre. These guys watched High Noon one too many times.

On the brighter side of things my other PhD friends who are thinking of flying the academic coop should be able to get work at the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, I figure. They'll need a cadre of people to replace those reports about war in Eurasia Eastasia Iraq with ones about war in Iran.

The coolest tattoo I have ever seen




Indirectly via BitchPhD

My bad

The photo posted below of the tsunami (the one with the umbrellas), as well as those found at the link in the post, were in fact, taken in 2002 China according to Snopes.

Second Amendment

Amidst all of this talk about the dems (Roemer) reconsidering their position on reproductive rights, I've been thinking about a different shift in position. While I couldn't agree more with the notion that the DNC chair should not be trumping the politics of capitulation, I do think the dems might want to rethink or at least nuance their position on gun control. Personally, I don't like guns. I'd be fine with a Constitution that never gave us the right to have them, but that's not the Constitution we have, and I think it's tough to hold a hard line position on free speech, right of assembly, and separation of church and state all the while legislating to take away guns.

Oliver Willis has written a lot about "brand democrat"--how to market the party, and I've always liked the idea of the "party of rights" or the "party of the Constitution" or something like that. It seems to me that new thinking on the right to bear arms might be a good way to appeal to a broader swath of the US. That is to say, democratic candidates need not go duck hunting (sigh), but they could talk about upholding the Constitution as a national obligation that involves compromise for each citizen. The Constitution as a sit down meal, not a buffet.

Just something I've been mulling over.

I'll bet there are parades in Mississippi

From Wonkette via Jesus' General comes this:

Today in Mississippi they are celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday alongside that of Robert E. Lee.

It boggles the mind. It really does.

Baby it's cold outside

The WaPo reports the 27th annual MLK parade in southeast was cancelled because Marion Barry is "worried about children getting sick because of the cold weather."

What's the forecast for Thursday, I'm wondering.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

From Declaration of Independence from the War in Vietnam

They watch as we poison their water, as we kill a million acres of their crops. They must weep as the bulldozers destroy their precious trees. They wander into the hospitals, with at least 20 casualties from American firepower for each Viet Cong-inflicted injury. So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children.

What do the peasants think as we ally ourselves with the landlords and as we refuse to put any action into our many words concerning land reform? What do they think as we test out our latest weapons on them, just as the Germans tested out new medic ine and new tortures in the concentration camps of Europe? Where are the roots of the independent Vietnam we claim to be building?

Now there is little left to build on, save bitterness. Soon the only solid physical foundations remaining will be found at our military bases and in the concrete of the concentration camps we call "fortified hamlets." The peasants may well wonder if we plan to build our new Vietnam on such grounds as these. Could we blame them for such thoughts'? We must speak for them and raise the questions they cannot raise. These too are our brothers.

. . .

At this point, I should make it clear that while I have tried here to give a voice to the voiceless of Vietnam and to understand the arguments of those who are called enemy, I am as deeply concerned about our own troops there as anything else. For it occurs to me that what we are submitting them to in Vietnam is not simply the brutalizing process that goes on in any war where armies face each other and seek to destroy. We are adding cynicism to the process of death, for our troops must know after a short period there that none of the things we claim to be fighting for are really involved. Before long they must know that their government has sent them into a struggle among Vietnamese, and the more sophisticated surely realize that we are on the side of the wealthy and the secure while we create a hell for the poor.

Somehow this madness must cease. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam and the poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop must be ours.

This is the message of the great Buddhist leaders of Vietnam. Recently, one of them wrote these words: "Each day the war goes on the hatred increases in the hearts of the Vietnamese and in the hearts of those of humanitarian instinct. The Americans are forcing even their friends into becoming their enemies. It is curious that the Americans, who calculate so carefully on the possibilities of military victory do not realize that in the process they are incurring deep psychological and political defeat. The image of America will never again be the image of revolution, freedom and democracy, but the image of violence and militarism."

. . .

I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. When machines and computers, profit and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.

A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look easily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say: " This is not just." The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: "This way of settling differences is not just." This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from re-ordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a recalcitrant status quo until we have fashioned it into a brotherhood.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

At this point, I should make it clear that while I have tried here to give a voice to the voiceless of Vietnam and to understand the arguments of those who are called enemy, I am as deeply concerned about our own troops there as anything else. For it occurs to me that what we are submitting them to in Vietnam is not simply the brutalizing process that goes on in any war where armies face each other and seek to destroy. We are adding cynicism to the process of death, for our troops must know after a short period there that none of the things we claim to be fighting for are really involved. Before long they must know that their government has sent them into a struggle among Vietnamese, and the more sophisticated surely realize that we are on the side of the wealthy and the secure while we create a hell for the poor.

Somehow this madness must cease. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam and the poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop must be ours.

This is the message of the great Buddhist leaders of Vietnam. Recently, one of them wrote these words: "Each day the war goes on the hatred increases in the hearts of the Vietnamese and in the hearts of those of humanitarian instinct. The Americans a reforcing even their friends into becoming their enemies. It is curious that the Americans, who calculate so carefully on the possibilities of military victory do not realize that in the process they are incurring deep psychological and political defeat. The image of America will never again be the image of revolution, freedom and democracy, but the image of violence and militarism."

. . .

I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. When machines and computers, profit and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triple ts of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.

A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look easily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say: " This is not just." The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: "This way of settling differences is not just." This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from re-ordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a recalcitrant status quo until we have fashioned it into a brotherhood.

Sunday, January 16, 2005

Funniest thing I've read in quite a while

If you're a total "save the manatee/brocolli has feelings too" kind of person, you shouldn't read this. But the rest of you really should.

Bacon = Freedom

Lettuce = Love
Tomato = Passion



These are way too much money but I love them.

Handbag anyone?

I love the sequins.

I hate chain letters as much as the next person

But this one begs to be shared:

This chain letter was started in hopes of bringing relief to other tired and discouraged women. Unlike most chain letters, this one does not cost anything. Just send a copy of this letter to five of your friends who are equally tired and discontented.

Then bundle up the man in your life, send him to the woman whose name appears at the top of the following list, and then add your name to the bottom of the list.

When your turn comes, you will receive 15,625 men. One of them is bound to be better than the one you already have.

At the writing of this letter, a friend of mine had already received 184 men, of whom 1 may be well worth keeping. An unmarried woman living with her widowed mother was able to choose between a Chippendale dancer and an Olympic swimmer.

You can be lucky, too, but DO NOT BREAK THE CHAIN!

One woman broke the chain and got her own husband back! So let's keep it going, ladies!

Just add your name and address to the list below:

Laura Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C.

One of us...one of us...

I thought I should share this one with my non-California friends. Jibjab did a smashing front cover for the LA Times opinion section today in honor of the "geopolitical three ring circus" that Bush' second terms promises to be.

Countdown to freedom




If the TV-be-gone keychain doesn't appeal to you, you can always opt for the Backwards Bush one (via Bush Beat)

A rodeo of all places

Borat Sagdiyev (aka Sacha Baron Cohen) nearly incited a riot at a Virginia rodeo with his thoughts on the war in Iraq and his rousing rendition of the Star Spangled Banner, ending with "your home in the grave." The line between parody and reality has grown thin enough that Cohen was easily able to disguise himself as an immigrant patriot in his black cowboy hat and American flag shirt. It wasn't until he launched into commentary like, "I hope you kill every man, woman and child in Iraq, down to the lizards," that the crowd began to suspect something was awry.

The Roanoke Times has set up a bulletin board for citizens to process their trauma. If you're looking for a little Sunday entertainment, I recommend it. You've got gems like this "the whole Roanoke Valley should drop HBO until they make a statement. We need to do this for the respect for men & ladies in our military and the kids that wittiness this fool" followed by this "Interesting statistic: in some states of the southern USA an impressive 75% of the population is functionally literate. That's quite some achievement - almost as good as China, at 90%."

And then you've got the compelling argument that all criticism of US leadership should be censored from media lest other "countires" laugh at us--ending with appeal, "this kind of behavior is not acceptable, and if you think it is, then you should take that "Proud to be an American" bumper sticker off your SUV." Not a problem.

As an aside, let me say that the more public bulletin boards I read about current events, the more I wonder whether the great experiment of democracy was a bit too idealistic.

Update: Oops--just saw that eponymous had this one before me. That's what I get for falling behind in my reading.

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Tsunami ghosts

Via Simplify Simplify comes the Telegraph story about ghosts in Thailand following the tsunami.
Volunteer body searchers at the resorts of Phi Phi Island and Khao Lak have been reported as claiming they have heard laughing and singing on a devastated beach only to find darkness and empty sand.

Taxi drivers at Patong on Phuket island swear they picked up a foreign man and his Thai girlfriend going to the airport with all their baggage, only to then look in the rear-view mirror and find an empty seat.

Guards at a beachfront plaza in Patong said one of their men had quit after hearing a foreign woman cry "help me" all night long and similar stories abound of a foreign ghost walking along the shoreline at night calling for her child.
The ghosts seem to be almost exclusively farangs (foreigners) who have not had relatives to bless their bodies and cremate them.
"[The tsunami] happened so quickly, the foreigners didn't know what happened and they all think they are still on the beach. They all think they are still on holiday," Patong bar manager Napaporn Phroyrungthong said.

And I thought the "Cathedral of Learning" was an odd choice

If you've never been to Pittsburgh, you may not know that the English classes at Pitt (along with those of other departments) are housed in a gothic high-rise named the Cathedral of Learning. The second largest education building in the world, "the cathedral" is, um, imposing despite its humble origins:
During the peak of the Depression, when funding for the project became especially challenging, school children were encouraged to contribute a dime to "buy a brick."
The Cathedral has come a long way from its brick-buying roots, and inside is a veritable hall of nations of classrooms. I, let me say, did not go to Pitt, and the buildings at the fine institution where I taught tended to favor poured concrete. When I visited Pittsburgh and toured the Cathedral, I felt so grateful that I didn't have to teach in a building that says to all of its surroundings "we are not of this world--we are above it and apart from it."

That said, I'm really scratching my head over GW's newest residence hall. Just puts it right out there, doesn't it? (Thanks to MemeFirst for the head's up.)

The difference between punks and libertarians

In the course of my online wanderings last night, I came across the Libertarian Party page, The Top 25 Liberty Songs. Let me say, it's very funny. First of all, how can one not raise an eyebrow at any song list, compiled for whatever reason, that includes both "My Life" by Billy Joel and "The Plan" by NOFX.

Second, at least some factions of the party seem to be suffering from a severe irony deficiency as testified to by inclusion of, for example, "Capitalism" by Oingo Boingo with the explanation "We are the only party who unabashedly supports capitalism and this song speaks to that. . . ."

And then there's this:
Song: My Way
Artist: Frank Sinatra
Album: My Way (WEA / Warner, 1969)
This song reflects our Libertarian spirit. To me, it is about freedom of choice in all aspects of our lives. Sinatra mentions regrets, yet he dealt with the consequences of the decisions...he never sought to be bailed out by anyone else due to poor choices. Upon reflection, there were good times and bad times, but he is happy and proud to have done it his way. The lyrics (by Paul Anka) are a tribute to the spirit of unbowed individualism: "For what is a man, what has he got / If not himself, then he has naught / To say the things he truly feels / And not the words of one who kneels / The record shows, I took the blows / And did it my way." I can not think of a better song to express my Libertarian beliefs.
I of course, immediately thought of Sid Vicious' cover and the blurb which would result from that fine rendition: ". . . he is happy and proud to have done it his way. And then he stabs his girlfriend to death in a drug-induced haze and, shortly thereafter, overcome by grief at her death, joins her in the great beyond after a drug overdose."




And that, ladies and gentlemen, pretty well captures why I am not a Libertarian.

California democrats: something for everyone

So Feinstein is doing her damnedest to make Lieberman look redeemable in a "should I bring the KY myself" bendover maneuver for the right. Dianne will be introducing Condoleeza Rice as candidate for secretary of state:
Dr. Rice has the skill, judgment, and poise to lead in these difficult times," Feinstein said. "If confirmed, she will have a critical asset in conducting American diplomacy -- the deep, personal trust and confidence of the president.

Meanwhile, Barbara Boxer seems to have miraculously survived the disease that has swept the democratic party, eating away at each politician's spine. Boxer has plans to grill Condi, and has prepared statements like "I personally believe that your loyalty to the mission you were given overwhelmed your respect for the truth."
She's asking constituents to sign on to the cause. If you'd like to register your protest as well as your approbation, Night Light has a sample epistle to Dianne "I can suck the chrome off a trailer hitch" Feinstein.

Maybe I was wrong about the mandate after all. Has anyone found Feinstein's pod yet?

Friday, January 14, 2005

Makes "Nova" look like a good marketing move

Remember that? When they tried to sell the Nova in Mexico without realizing "no va" means "doesn't go" in Spanish? Well, Toyota just announced they are changing plans to name their forthcoming car the "Tsunami."

Places everyone

Setting the stage for next week's inaugural



Tom Ridge is the producer



The theme is "Celebrating Freedom, Honoring Service"



And Bush even has a stunt dummy

No you may not pet my monkey

The difference between Germans and Italians

Rudolph Moshammer, German fashion designer, was found murdered today. Though I'd not heard of him before, I guess he was quite the phenomenon. Among his clients were the dynamic duo, Siegfried and Roy, as well as California's own Herr Governor. It seems he favored flamboyant, German-speaking extremists. So far the police haven't dug up a motive...there were no signs of a fight or burglary.

I know the comparison is tempting, but...



...we're not talking about Versace here.

Run out of toilet paper?

No problem, just use the Constitution; everyone else is.

Not to be outdone by our future Attorney General, Tom Ridge came out with his own doublespeak statement about why it's okay to beat the crap out of people and make them shit on themselves:
Mr Ridge told BBC News 24's HARDtalk: "By and large, as a matter of policy we need to state over and over again: we do not condone the use of torture to extract information from terrorists."

But he said it was "human nature" that torture might be employed in certain exceptional cases when time was very limited.
We don't condone it, but that won't stop us from doing it if we have to. It's that old bugaboo, human nature. Torture's kind of like sin...we don't advocate it, but it's inevitable. What's a government to do with that?

I'll hand it to Ridge for putting forth perhaps the most honest defense of Guantanamo:
Mr Ridge argued the HRW report reflected a "foreign perception" that the US was using different methods to those employed before the 11 September 2001 attacks.
What's to get excited about folks? We're no strangers to torture here in the US. We just didn't used to post the pics to the Internet before.

Deep sigh.

Oh dear

I suspect someone's been surfing memepool or the like. I got this via email this morning, and I really know the feeling.




And here I am reminded of that old joke "why do dogs lick themselves..."




Rubber boy's extremely metaphoric resume moment:
Daniel’s tour de force is a brand new feat he himself invented: the De-escape! Using a straitjacket, a long chain, and a small trunk, Daniel revives the lost art of "enterology."
I don't think I have ever run into a more potent analogy for my relationship history in my life.

Feast your ears no more

While we're on the subject of music, let me take a moment to bow my head in recognition of the passing of a giant. WHFS, a legend in DC radio, is no more. The demise comes after protracted decline in which the word "progressive" eventually came to mean "white boys willing to use the word 'fuck' in a song" and "alternative" was warped into something akin to "mainstream" (much like the political world, no?).

But back in it's heyday, WHFS was the jewel of Washington culture. When I was in high school, before HFS got bandwidth and moved out of Bethesda and developed playlists, etc., you'd strain to get it on the radio and put up with the fuzz and static just because it was so goddamned excellent. They had this assortment of DJs all of whom were so undeejay-like: weasel, damien, and some British guy who had a night show where he would play the freshest UK punk. If you had a local band, you could bring a record by and hang out with them while they played it. From Laurie Anderson to the first Dischord pressings to Einstürzende Neubauten. You name it. Anyway, I'm just saying it's a sad day. HFS provided the soundtrack for my young life. In the middle of the Reagan era with everyone sucking up as much of the "before" part of Bonfire of the Vanities as possible, they made you feel like maybe you weren't nuts after all if you gave a shit about something other than greed and power.

Washingtonians seem to be taking it hard despite the fact that the station has been past its prime for a long time now. As an aside, let me say that both Washington Post articles characterize DC101 as HFS's competitor, which I find a bit astonishing. Clearly, I have been gone for a long time. When I lived in DC, 101 was a headbanger station that pioneered shock jocks. In fact, before he was world-renown, Howard Stern was simply a plague on Washington at 101. Though in a decision they must still rue, they fired him when he called Air Florida the day after a plane crash in Washington that killed 70-something people and asked how much it would cost for a one-way ticket to the Fourteenth Street bridge. Somehow, a few years later, they determined to keep the Greaseman on staff after he, on Martin Luther King Day, remarked that we should "kill four more and get the whole week off." Good god I wish I was making that up. So you see folks, the world is not newly fucked up. Hatred and bigotry are not some innovation dreamed up by the radical right. They're just the newest head on the hydra.

But I digress.

Good bye WHFS. Thanks for playing musical nanny for so many of us when we were growing up. You've been missed for a long time really, but now it's official.

Thursday, January 13, 2005

Why cars are great

You know, I am not overly fond of driving. In fact, I did not drive ever before I moved to LA. And I still know the surface street route anywhere I need to go.

But that said, this morning I woke up feeling like someone had sucked the life force from me. Two days of stupid-crazy, decathlon-style work (like if they made Mountain Dew commercials for nonprofit writers kind of work) and way too little sleep reduced me to feeling like all of the blood had been drained from my body overnight and replaced with something way too viscous.

I'm in my car, driving to work half-delirious, and Social Distortion's Ball and Chain comes on the radio (we love 103.1, which may, on any given morning, be playing Dancing Queen or Nervous Breakdown, depending on DJ whim). And suddenly my entire day was transformed. There is little that brings me more pleasure than singing at the top of my lungs with all of the windows down, especially at red lights when the other drivers look at me like they're contemplating calling an emergency vehicle just in case. I do not have a particularly good voice (to put it nicely), and this morning it was wailing:
Take away, take away
Take away this ball and chain
I'm lonely and I'm tired
And I can't take any more pain
Yeah. And then, there's the going home part. It's really nice not to have to sit next to anyone on my way home from work. I like being in a pod. I guess this means I've been pretty thoroughly coopted by Los Angeles. (Though my friends have been alerted to perform an intervention if I start talking about fake boobs.)

[Spell check oddity: Blogger wants to turn "boobs" into "bob's" though it does recognize "boobies." I'm fascinated by spell checkers.]

Not quite a regret...

Coming up for air from the damn-the-torpedoes work load. It's still plenty busy, but not put-you-in-the-hospital busy. There's so much to get caught up on...

Did anyone see the story about Bush regretting the fact that he has no command of his native tongue? It's pretty funny. First there's this:
On July 2, 2003, two months after he had declared an end to major combat in Iraq, Bush promised U.S. forces would stay until the creation of a free government there. To those who would attack U.S. forces in an attempt to deter that mission, Bush said, "My answer is, Bring 'em on."

"Sometimes, words have consequences you don't intend them to mean," Bush said Thursday. "'Bring 'em on' is the classic example, when I was really trying to rally the troops and make it clear to them that I fully understood, you know, what a great job they were doing. And those words had an unintended consequence. It kind of, some interpreted it to be defiance in the face of danger. That certainly wasn't the case."
And then he goes on to say maybe "wanted dead or alive" was a poor choice of words when talking about Bin Laden:
In the week after the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush was asked if he wanted bin Laden, the terrorist leader blamed for the attacks, dead.

"I want justice," Bush said. "And there's an old poster out West, that I recall, that said, 'Wanted, Dead or Alive.'"

Recalling that remark, Bush said Thursday: "I can remember getting back to the White House, and Laura said, 'Why did you do that for?' I said, 'Well, it was just an expression that came out. I didn't rehearse it.'

"I don't know if you'd call it a regret, but it certainly is a lesson that a president must be mindful of, that the words that you sometimes say. ... I speak plainly sometimes, but you've got to be mindful of the consequences of the words. So put that down. I don't know if you'd call that a confession, a regret, something."

In his second debate last year with presidential challenger Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites), Bush was asked to name three instances in which he had made a wrong decision. At the time he declined to identify any specific mistakes.

I love the little AP dig at the end there. And I love that he quotes Laura as saying "Why did you do that for?"

You know, I taught English for years, and my students would say, "Why do we have to learn this stuff?" I used to explain things about critical thinking and learning how to think, not necessarily what to think. But now I know; the real answer is so that if you ever find yourself leader of the most powerful country in the world, you don't sound like a total dumbfuck.

And let's not forget, he's not the first Republican to regret saying dumb shit.

So fucking cool it hurts

I've been seriously thinking of getting a handheld, and now I may I have to just so that I can get a cool as fuck projection keyboard (via Red Ferret). Now if we can just work on the replicator technology. . .

Here we go again...

...burning Christians.

It seems that Oxford's Center for the Science of the Mind will be burning volunteers (religious and secular folks) "to see if faith eases pain," as part of a series of experiments designed to better understand "the pain matrix." Burn-ees will be shown images of the Virgin Mary and crucifixes. The scientists hope to also "include people with survival techniques in the experiments, which may help the special forces easily identify people with high pain thresholds." I'm not even 100% sure what BBC is getting at in this sentence but it sounds a creepy to me--using scientifically simulated torture as a recruitment effort.

Maybe my job's not that bad afterall.

The politics of Ellen James

Edward Kennedy to the National Press Club:
We cannot move our party or our nation forward under pale colors and timid voices. We cannot become Republican clones. If we do, we will lose again, and deserve to lose.
Let me say again that it pleases me that Dean is running for DNC chair. Lately I have really been wondering if the better part of the Democratic "leadership" (let's hear it for oxymorons) has been lobotomized or whether someone has slipped paxil into their coffee or what. Yes, yes, they are the minority party. Yes, the reelection of Bush is a drubbing to be sure. But where are their voices? The elimination of social security, the rise of the deficit, the utter disregard--no contempt--for civil liberties and human rights...the list of issues from which to build a platform of attack on the crypto-fascists is long and getting longer. And somehow the dems have decided to position themselves as the Ellen Jamesian party. Come out swinging guys! Watch some old boxing movies or something.

Here's Dean via The Nation:
That word--'values'--has lately become a codeword for appeasement of the right-wing fringe. But when political calculations make us soften our opposition to bigotry, or sign on to policies that add to the burden of ordinary Americans, we have abandoned our true values.
What he said.

Losing the will to live

So as I've said, things have been full throttle for me at work this week. Extreme, full-on, barely enough time or energy to wash myself or make toast kind of week. I stayed at work until 8-something and then left for a West Wing break with two friends. Came home at 10:30, went to open the document, which I had emailed myself, and it's the wrong one. Oy vey, I think (having also emailed it to someone else for review). I log into the network to find the right version and it's gone. It's just not fucking there. None of the versions show revisions past ten this morning. I have looked every where. (And know that I am totally OCD with saving my documents. I am like the boy who couldn't stop washing with control-c.) Thank fucking god, I printed a copy. I am now reentering the work by reviewing the stupid text paragraph by paragraph. I'm sure I did some dumb sleep-deprived thing to have it get sucked into the vortex, but even so I am feeling a lot like god hates me.

Sleep is for sissies.

Wednesday, January 12, 2005

And while we're on the subject of shameless criminality

Maggie's boy has pled guilty to funding the Equatorial Guinea coup. Why would he do that, you ask? That's right...it's that old hero black gold, Texas tea, once again playing the starring role in the western world's empire attempts. Remember the good old days here when we would just finance coups instead of invade countries? Well, I guess they are bringing back death squads; that's a step in that direction.

Oh the ecstasy of the irony

Don King is suing ESPN for two and a half billion dollars (yes, that's billion folks) for, among other things calling him a "shameless huckster" and a "snake oil salesman."

I am groggy as all get out and my eyes feel like poached eggs, but I need to tell you, that just cheered me right up.

One more day...

...of balls to the wall work--or whatever the chick equivalent might be. Yesterday was a marathon. Today I am groggy and hung over. Almost there...

In the meantime, let me weigh in on two things.

First, I am really happy Dean is stepping up to the plate. This last election managed to align the liberals and progressives in common cause against our nation's scariest factions. Now, having lost the election, some of the dems are arguing that somehow it would be an improvement to excise the Michael Moore-ish, Move-on-ish members of the party. I say: Huh? How do you figure. We came on board for your guy. It didn't happen for us. Give us a chance to see if we can make it happen. Anyway, I'm still willing to get in bed with the dems even if they decide that they should continue their "I'm really not that liberal" strategy. I just hope we can start to move away from the party of capitulation platform.

Second, I just hope we're in time to arrest the seemingly inexorable slide to fascism. The latest two articles to make my stomach lurch in this regard are the LA Times article referenced in the interrogation smileys post below and the Herald article posted by the Alternate Brain on the government's doomsday plan. And then today I read about a "surprising surge" in the trade deficit. I have no time for sustained hand-wringing here. I'm just saying it doesn't look good, folks. As I posted on the Brain, I'm thinking it's time to start learning German.

Okay, back to the rockpile. More soon.

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

Pinch me



Art Spiegelman is having the same recurring nightmare I am. Thanks to Chris for pointing it out.

Clearly I don't watch enough TV

I've decided I need a desk monkey.

And on a related note, I love that Yahoo has a whole humor category devoted to animals (I think I must have been a librarian in a last life), but I find it most disturbing that "seal clubbing" is one of the subcategories.

Quote of the day

"Honesty is closely associated with freedom."

Guess who said it. I'll bet you can't....

Mr. Rogers!

Aren't you jealous? I have a World According to Mr. Rogers page-a-day calendar. I'm sure you'll hear more from him as the year rolls on.

Have I mentioned its been raining?

Lest you think I've been making a mountain out of a molehill (or mudslide).

Andrea's calling this first one "picture of my dissertation."




The second feels a bit more metaphorical of my own work these days. But perhaps that's the shift from grad school to the world of nonprofit writing.




Both from BBC

(And, praise Jesus, the sun is shining today. We are all coming in off the ledge.)

Monday, January 10, 2005

First ten against the wall

When the revolution comes...

I know it's hard to narrow the list, but I'm thinking Bill O'Reilly definitely qualifies. In his latest, he labels reporting on Gonzales "coordinated attacks" by the "aggressive" and "organized" we're-so-far-left-it-may-almost-feel-right-to-you media "machine."

But fear not: for only $8.95, you can blot him out forever. (from Romenesko)

Others on my list: W, Gonzales, Ann Coulter, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Scalia...

I'm having a hard time winnowing down the last three though. Nominations?

Interrogation smileys

I'm sorry I'm not more skilled or, in fact, motivated to make this graphic more legible, but you can find it via Phaedo. It's part of an interrogation diagram...a real U.S. government one. Not a parody, despite appearances to the contrary.

Here are some close-ups:









The chart is part of a larger document that contains the text you see on Phaedo's site: "Visit the database every time you spend time with any of our esteemed guests. Tell the database about what fun conversation you and your guests had."

I saw it in the LA Times Sunday story about medical professionals and Abu Ghraib torture (more on that in the next post), and truly, I did not believe it was real. I had to go hunt it down, and even now I am having one of those "at any moment I will wake up and this will all have been a very bad dream" experiences.

I was already a bit over the edge when I tracked down this latest atrocity. The prospect of Gonzo as our AG has me feeling desperate about the state of things. Andrea reminded me of my own line (first articulated in reference to something completely different), "The camel's back broke a long time ago. You're just realizing it now."

"Think of who he's replacing," she said. I argued that Ashcroft, while Satanic, was only a minion to the Devil compared to Gonzales, who seems high-priestlike to me. "He's just differently evil," she said. I disagreed.

The thing about this administration and this moment in history that's so shocking to me is the brazenness of our venality, our lack of apology about our own reign of terror at home and abroad. I am not a naive person; any of us on the left know about horrors of Vietnam perpetrated with a wink and a nod, but it wasn't written into policy and, were it, we wouldn't be considering the architect of the policy for Attorney General. Shit, in the Reagan era when that band of crooks completely circumvented democratic process, they put up Ollie North as a fall guy and all shook their heads in dismay over his actions, happy to have a lone gunman. Now no one even feigns remorse or a basic level of respect for human rights. Bring back the sham! I want to at least believe they know that what they've done is wrong in someone's eyes, if not their own. All of which led to Andrea identifying me as "a liberal in the best sense of the term" because I still believe in the rule of law.

And I do. I wrote a whole goddamned dissertation about the Constitution. I can tell you, our republic is legitimized by the law. That's the platform upon which we've built our nation. And why? Because we did not have the already-legitimizing foundation of birth or religion. That's why the Constitution begins "We the People"; in reading it, we assimilate ourselves into the republic--we move from being private people with individual concerns ("interests" in the words of the oft-misunderstood founders) to rights-bearing citizens.

All of which is to say I really do think we're fucked, folks. But more on that note tomorrow.

More reasons to disdain the French

Okay, I admit it. I don't disdain the French at all. In fact, I just got out of a two-hour work meeting that I disrupted three times with my snazzy pen that lights up in red, blue, and white, and plays Les Marseilles when you click it. Hurrah for tourism kitsch and basically anything that keeps me mildly entertained during meetings about meetings. Yeah.

The only real solution to my work load currently is to undertake some sort of human cloning project. Blogging will likely be of the light "get a load of that--har, har, har" variety until 1.work lets up a little and 2.the rain lets up a little. Thinking about Gonzales or the Iraq elections during the dual deluges makes me want to lie in traffic too much.

So...har, har, har. Here's one for you:

Excerpts from the Sunday LA Times' dueling obituaries piece, "Sontag vs. Derrida: A Deconstruction Derby":

You should feel dumb because

[Sontag was] "the most intelligent woman in America" (New York Daily News)

[Derrida was] "the smartest man in the world" (Raphael Simon, The Times)

And because

Sontag was 33 when she published her first famous essay collection, "Against Interpretation"

Derrida was 37 when he published his first three major philosophical tomes, including the essay collection "Writing and Difference"

It was the hair, apparently

Sontag was a "strong-featured beauty with a trademark streak of white shot through her unruly black hair (New York Daily News)

Derrida was a "snowy-haired French intellectual" (Associated Press)

The president says he's bummed out

No

Yes (Jacques Chirac)

Had to share obituary pages with

Jerry Orbach, actor

Christopher Reeve, activist/actor

Probably wishes hadn't said

"The white race is the cancer of human history."

"The least bad definition of deconstruction is a certain experience of the impossible."

Contrarian comment about Sept. 11

"Whatever may be said of the perpetrators of Tuesday's slaughter, they were not cowards."

"The brevity of the appellation (Sept. 11, 9/11) points out the unqualifiable by recognizing that we do not recognize or even cognize that we do not yet know how to qualify, that we do not know what we are talking about."
Say what?? I guess that's one way to avoid the death threats Sontag had to deal with after her statements on 9/11: be so inscrutable no one even knows whether you're a "patriot" or not.

Paper or plastic

Apropos of nothing, I pass along the story of Dean Wooten who was fired from Wal-Mart for photoshopping his head onto a body naked save for a strategically placed Wal-Mart bag. It was Wooten's need to share the photo with customers explaining that Wal-Mart was rolling back costs for uniforms that got him the sack, as it were.
Wooten said he did not see the harm in the photo, which he said was made by a friend who spliced a picture of Wooten's head onto a shot of another man's body.

"When I first seen it, I pretty near died laughing," he said.
Have I mentioned that it's still raining here in LA? It's getting increasingly difficult to maintain a good humor, that's all I'm saying.

Tag lines take two

So I mulled and mulled about a tagline for NMTE, and I finally decided on "blogging while Rome burns," but now I'm having second thoughts. Which do you guys like?

1. blogging while Rome burns
2. some of my best friends are liberals
3. civil rights canary in a fundy coalmine

I was trying to work something in with the word "kakistocracy," but I didn't come to anything.

Or I could just change it on a regular basis.

Thoughts?

Who will bake the cookies?

China has made selective sex abortions illegal. The potent combination of a one-child policy and capital-P Patriarchy means that 119 boys are born in China for every 100 girls, a ratio the government is attempting to change:
"The government takes it as an urgent task to correct the gender imbalance of newborns," the official Xinhua news agency quoted Zhang Weiqing, minister in charge of the National Population and Family Planning Commission
Because I am in a rush and because my friends are so smart, I will give you their thoughts here. The story came to me in an email that said this:
How do we feel about this? On the one hand, it's a victory over misogynist medicine. On the other, it's a blow against reproductive choice in a place where there's already not much of that (and where choice and abortion have a very different relationship to one another than they do here...)
To which there was a reply from another really smart friend that included this:
Probably the only reason the government wants to put a stop to sex-selective abortions is that they worry there won't be enough women to clean and cook and twiddle the wee-wees of Chinese men.
I'm thinking maybe Cosgrove should move to China. He'd have a field day with legislation there. Anyway, talk amongst yourselves...

AP headlines brought to you by the letter "duh"

Feminists Face Tough Times After Election

With incisive commentary like "some of Bush's best friends are women":
Bush, of course, can make a strong case that he respects women — his new Cabinet will likely have four, including Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) as secretary of state, and women for years have been among his closest political and legal advisers.

Beyond Washington, meanwhile, women are making impressive professional gains — as big-city police chiefs and university presidents, for example. They now comprise roughly half the enrollment in U.S. medical schools. And though a wage gap persists, woman now earn 80 percent of what men do, compared to 62 percent in 1980.
Gee whiz. What are all those bra-burners complaining about then? If a woman can be a big-city police chief and earn 80% of what a man does...well, good for you, honey.

Abbas Sees 'Difficult Mission' After Win
Mahmoud Abbas declared victory in Palestinian presidential elections on Sunday after exit polls showed him winning by a wide margin, giving him a decisive mandate to renew peace talks with Israel, rein in militants and try to end more than four years of Mideast bloodshed.
Good luck with that. And can we all just agree to stop using the word "mandate." All it means is that someone was elected, ferchrissakes.

Plum Job Opportunities Await Old Cabinet
Given their employment options, former Cabinet officials are less likely than former members of Congress to become rank-and-file lobbyists, he said.

Several officials who left during Bush's first term quickly found new sources of income.
Well, I'm relieved to know they won't be clogging up those welfare rolls.

Sunday, January 09, 2005

What spider venom isn't bad enough?

In our ongoing "decline of the American empire" category, we see that four people were paralyzed from injections of raw botulism, marketed as a cheap alternative to botox. At least they were couples. Perhaps there's some comfort in that. "Gee honey, your forehead looks so smooth. Bummer the ventilator is messing up the photos so much."

The difference between us and them

You know, the problem with the cowboy mythos is that you can't tell stories like this:

BEIJING, Jan. 7 -- During his new year visit to Northwest China's Shaanxi Province, Premier Wen Jiabao urged that safety must be improved this year to avoid mining accidents. The premier even shed tears with the family of a dead miner as he listened to their memories of the deceased. Below are excerpts of comments incited by this moving scene.

. . .

Wen conveyed his sympathy for those who have suffered from accidents. His tears were not only for the victims of the Tongchuan coal mine disaster, but also for other lives lost in the country's frequent coal mine accidents caused by low-level human error.

. . .

www.rednet.com.cn: During his new year visit to the families of victims who died in the Chenjiashan Coal Mine gas explosion, Premier Wen Jiabao shed doleful tears for those who lost their beloved relatives. His tears moistened this afflicted land and warmed the hearts of all Chinese, who can now feel cared for and cherished by the government.

From Premier Wen's tears, we see how in touch he is with the feelings of the nation. His dining with on-duty miners in a coal shaft about 1,300 metres underground, his tears for the boy who lost his father in a major coal mine accident and his pledge to help poor miners overcome any adversity, all demonstrated his love for the people and his low-profile manner.

From Premier Wen's tears, we see his willingness to become close to grass-roots communities. He vows to bear all tribulations together with the people and he bravely shoulders the responsibility of the successive coal mine disasters.

From Premier Wen's tears, we see his resolution and expectations. He stressed the importance of improving coal mine safety and went deep into a mine for an inspection. His words and deeds displayed the nation's firm stance on promoting production safety.

Showing more concern for the grievances of common people and sharing their trials are what government officials should learn from Premier Wen.

. . .
Instead we get read-it-and-weep stories like this:
It hurled like a cannonball into Dennis and Cindy Davidson's house, right through the wall of the bedroom and onto the bed where 3-year-old Jeremy was sleeping.

The huge boulder continued its path, crashing through a closet before finally stopping at the foot of 8-year-old Zachary's bed. Zachary would be fine. Jeremy was crushed to death.

. . .

The A&G work crew did not learn about it until an hour later, when a mechanic driving home at the end of his shift passed the Davidsons' house and saw the ambulance. After asking what had happened, he returned to the mountaintop to alert his co-workers.

The [mining] agency contends that Jeremy Davidson died not because the laws were lax but because existing laws and rules were broken. It has accused A&G of "gross negligence."

. . .

Many residents are angry at the agency, believing it has failed to protect them. Some never complained, saying they knew that nothing would come of it. Local legislators appointed by Gov. Mark R. Warner (D) to a panel overseeing the investigation said they were struck by the level of frustration.

"Not only are they down on the coal companies, they're down on DMME," said Sen. Phillip P. Puckett (D-Russell), who attended a four-hour meeting with residents last month. "The last thing they said to us was, 'Thank you for coming and hearing us, but we don't think you're going to do anything.' There's an issue of credibility."
Try crying, Phil. It works for Wen.

I'll bet Bush's approval rating would go up if he'd let a couple of tears dribble down his chin now and then. No one would need to know he was weeping because the pet goat foiled the robber and saved the day. Come on Bush--where's the love? Put some compassion in compassionate conservatism.